<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: we all think we&#8217;re right all of the time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/</link>
	<description>Promoting good driving by exposing bad driving in Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Not too sure I understood this post, Im pretty sure you do give way to traffic coming from the right.

Ireland must be the only country in the world that has traffic lights on a roundabout (Red cow)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not too sure I understood this post, Im pretty sure you do give way to traffic coming from the right.</p>
<p>Ireland must be the only country in the world that has traffic lights on a roundabout (Red cow)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hayes</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>james hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Now let me tell you i hate truck drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let me tell you i hate truck drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hayes</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>james hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Bad driving &#039;linked to hormones&#039;  
 
Parked by a man or a woman? 
Spatial skills such as map reading and parking may be difficult for some women because they had too little testosterone in the womb. 
Some men have long held that women are deficient in these skills. 

Scientists from the University of Giessen, Germany, writing in the journal Intelligence found a lack of the hormone affects spatial ability. 

Low testosterone levels are also linked to shorter wedding ring fingers, they say. 

The research looked at the spatial, numerical and verbal skills of 40 student volunteers from Galway. Men do seem to be better at spatial abilities, and women at verbal and emotional skills 

Dr Nick Neave, British Psychological Society  
Spatial skill is the ability to assess and orientate shapes and spaces. Map reading and parking are spatial skills which men often say women lack. Women tend to disagree. 

The researchers also looked at the length of the students&#039; wedding and index fingers. 

In women, the two fingers are usually almost equal in length, as measured from the crease nearest the palm to the fingertip. In men, the ring finger tends to be much longer than the index. 

For one of the spatial tests, volunteers had to tell which of five drawings could not be rotated so it looked like the other four. 

The other test involved the ability to think in 3D by mentally &quot;unfolding&quot; a complex shape. 

Overall, men achieved higher scores in the tests than women. 

But women with the male pattern of finger length did better than those whose wedding finger was shorter. 

They also scored better on the numerical tests. 

Fertility 

Writing in Intelligence, the researchers, led by Dr Petra Kempel, said women who had &#039;male-like&#039; finger length ratio patterns outperformed other women. 

They added that the differences seen within the group studied were &quot;remarkable.&quot; 

However, the researchers accept that their study was limited because only one saliva sample was taken from each person, and no detailed account was taken of women&#039;s menstrual cycle, which can affect hormone balance. 

Other studies looking at finger length ratio have suggested that, in men a long ring finger and symmetrical hands are an indication of fertility, and that women are more likely to be fertile if they have a longer index finger. 

Another study controversially suggested that finger length ratio could also be linked to sexual orientation, with lesbian women having a greater difference in length between their ring finger and index finger than straight women do. 

Dr Nick Neave, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Northumbria who specialises in spatial awareness and gender differences. 

He said: &quot;Being exposed to testosterone early on does seem to affect the way the brain works. 

&quot;It seems to push it to work in a more masculine way, with a stronger right hemisphere; the spatial hemisphere. 

&quot;The extra testosterone also appears to cause the ring finger to be longer than the index.&quot; 

Bones contain testosterone receptors, and Dr Neave said the fourth finger appeared to be particularly receptive to levels of the hormone. 

Higher levels are linked the ring finger being longer than the index. 

Dr Neave, a member of the British Psychological Society, added: &quot;The sexes do use different skills to find their way around. Men seem to be able to keep the route in their head without landmarks, whereas women do use them. 

&quot;So men may be better at finding the car when its parked in a huge shopping centre car-park. It may also tap into driving and parking abilities.&quot; 

He added: &quot;Men do seem to be better at spatial abilities, and women at verbal and emotional skills. 

&quot;It may be a generalisation, but that does seem to be the case.&quot; 

But Dr David Gray of the Department of Philosophy at Harvard University, said: &quot;Correlation between genetic features and skills may often have an environmental intermediary which determines performance at a given skill.&quot; 

He suggested skilled drivers may be those who are more practised at the activity. In addition, he said people with longer ring fingers may have dominating personalities and therefore do more driving. 

&quot;This practice would make them better at these activities and would be correlated with a physical feature, but not caused by it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad driving &#8216;linked to hormones&#8217;  </p>
<p>Parked by a man or a woman?<br />
Spatial skills such as map reading and parking may be difficult for some women because they had too little testosterone in the womb.<br />
Some men have long held that women are deficient in these skills. </p>
<p>Scientists from the University of Giessen, Germany, writing in the journal Intelligence found a lack of the hormone affects spatial ability. </p>
<p>Low testosterone levels are also linked to shorter wedding ring fingers, they say. </p>
<p>The research looked at the spatial, numerical and verbal skills of 40 student volunteers from Galway. Men do seem to be better at spatial abilities, and women at verbal and emotional skills </p>
<p>Dr Nick Neave, British Psychological Society<br />
Spatial skill is the ability to assess and orientate shapes and spaces. Map reading and parking are spatial skills which men often say women lack. Women tend to disagree. </p>
<p>The researchers also looked at the length of the students&#8217; wedding and index fingers. </p>
<p>In women, the two fingers are usually almost equal in length, as measured from the crease nearest the palm to the fingertip. In men, the ring finger tends to be much longer than the index. </p>
<p>For one of the spatial tests, volunteers had to tell which of five drawings could not be rotated so it looked like the other four. </p>
<p>The other test involved the ability to think in 3D by mentally &#8220;unfolding&#8221; a complex shape. </p>
<p>Overall, men achieved higher scores in the tests than women. </p>
<p>But women with the male pattern of finger length did better than those whose wedding finger was shorter. </p>
<p>They also scored better on the numerical tests. </p>
<p>Fertility </p>
<p>Writing in Intelligence, the researchers, led by Dr Petra Kempel, said women who had &#8216;male-like&#8217; finger length ratio patterns outperformed other women. </p>
<p>They added that the differences seen within the group studied were &#8220;remarkable.&#8221; </p>
<p>However, the researchers accept that their study was limited because only one saliva sample was taken from each person, and no detailed account was taken of women&#8217;s menstrual cycle, which can affect hormone balance. </p>
<p>Other studies looking at finger length ratio have suggested that, in men a long ring finger and symmetrical hands are an indication of fertility, and that women are more likely to be fertile if they have a longer index finger. </p>
<p>Another study controversially suggested that finger length ratio could also be linked to sexual orientation, with lesbian women having a greater difference in length between their ring finger and index finger than straight women do. </p>
<p>Dr Nick Neave, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Northumbria who specialises in spatial awareness and gender differences. </p>
<p>He said: &#8220;Being exposed to testosterone early on does seem to affect the way the brain works. </p>
<p>&#8220;It seems to push it to work in a more masculine way, with a stronger right hemisphere; the spatial hemisphere. </p>
<p>&#8220;The extra testosterone also appears to cause the ring finger to be longer than the index.&#8221; </p>
<p>Bones contain testosterone receptors, and Dr Neave said the fourth finger appeared to be particularly receptive to levels of the hormone. </p>
<p>Higher levels are linked the ring finger being longer than the index. </p>
<p>Dr Neave, a member of the British Psychological Society, added: &#8220;The sexes do use different skills to find their way around. Men seem to be able to keep the route in their head without landmarks, whereas women do use them. </p>
<p>&#8220;So men may be better at finding the car when its parked in a huge shopping centre car-park. It may also tap into driving and parking abilities.&#8221; </p>
<p>He added: &#8220;Men do seem to be better at spatial abilities, and women at verbal and emotional skills. </p>
<p>&#8220;It may be a generalisation, but that does seem to be the case.&#8221; </p>
<p>But Dr David Gray of the Department of Philosophy at Harvard University, said: &#8220;Correlation between genetic features and skills may often have an environmental intermediary which determines performance at a given skill.&#8221; </p>
<p>He suggested skilled drivers may be those who are more practised at the activity. In addition, he said people with longer ring fingers may have dominating personalities and therefore do more driving. </p>
<p>&#8220;This practice would make them better at these activities and would be correlated with a physical feature, but not caused by it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hayes</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>james hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-722</guid>
		<description>You forgot one thing, Galway is one place that they cant even park
so when it comes to roundabouts it must be very hard for them, to do something moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot one thing, Galway is one place that they cant even park<br />
so when it comes to roundabouts it must be very hard for them, to do something moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Listen its like this...regarding galway drivers!!!!

all rules regarding giving way to on-coming traffic from your right on roundabouts means absolutly Zero in Galway city. Your going around the roundabout and drivers just at you blankly and pull out in front of you so you have to break suddenly. This happens EVERY time. My friends from england were over at the weekend and could not believe the carry on with the driving! SO ANY GALWAY DRIVERS READING THIS TAKE HEED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen its like this&#8230;regarding galway drivers!!!!</p>
<p>all rules regarding giving way to on-coming traffic from your right on roundabouts means absolutly Zero in Galway city. Your going around the roundabout and drivers just at you blankly and pull out in front of you so you have to break suddenly. This happens EVERY time. My friends from england were over at the weekend and could not believe the carry on with the driving! SO ANY GALWAY DRIVERS READING THIS TAKE HEED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Roundabouts are in general a good idea.
But people are shite.
That&#039;s probably not entirely fair - all people are shite some of the time is probably a bit more accurate.
It seems that everyone posting here knows the rules - they&#039;re simple enough and generally work.
So why then to we have one person arriving at the roundabout at 100kph assuming  they have right of way before they even get on the roundabout and another who will sit at the yield sign watching an empty roundabout until at least one car passes???
People are shite (at least sometimes) but those responsible for implementing roundabouts and ROTR should bombard the populace with education on road usage. It&#039;ll get through to everyone eventually. I suggest using TV and tabloids...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roundabouts are in general a good idea.<br />
But people are shite.<br />
That&#8217;s probably not entirely fair &#8211; all people are shite some of the time is probably a bit more accurate.<br />
It seems that everyone posting here knows the rules &#8211; they&#8217;re simple enough and generally work.<br />
So why then to we have one person arriving at the roundabout at 100kph assuming  they have right of way before they even get on the roundabout and another who will sit at the yield sign watching an empty roundabout until at least one car passes???<br />
People are shite (at least sometimes) but those responsible for implementing roundabouts and ROTR should bombard the populace with education on road usage. It&#8217;ll get through to everyone eventually. I suggest using TV and tabloids&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primal Sneeze</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Primal Sneeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Is the problem with our roundabouts or with our drivers? Okay, the above post and comments verify the latter, but should we be considering the former? Are many of our roundabouts designed and sited so badly that the rules of the road and of common sense cannot be applied?

e.g. The ROTR deal with &#039;straight ahead&#039;, yet there are roundabouts where there is no exit at that point. Or those with 3 or more exits prior to an imaginary &#039;straight ahead&#039; and none thereafter, yet two lanes leading onto it.
e.g. Roundabouts that stifle rather than smooth the flow of traffic, as they are intended. Those situated where there should be traffic lights, and those with lights themselves. Those where a T junction would suffice.
e.g. Ones with raised centres that obscure the view of on-coming vehicles. 
e.g. Roundabouts built because, in the long run, they are cheaper than maintaining lights (or deities forbid, cheaper than flyovers).

Just some thoughts - flame me or agree or add. I&#039;m easy. Just think about it. And think about it when your local authority is building yet another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the problem with our roundabouts or with our drivers? Okay, the above post and comments verify the latter, but should we be considering the former? Are many of our roundabouts designed and sited so badly that the rules of the road and of common sense cannot be applied?</p>
<p>e.g. The ROTR deal with &#8216;straight ahead&#8217;, yet there are roundabouts where there is no exit at that point. Or those with 3 or more exits prior to an imaginary &#8216;straight ahead&#8217; and none thereafter, yet two lanes leading onto it.<br />
e.g. Roundabouts that stifle rather than smooth the flow of traffic, as they are intended. Those situated where there should be traffic lights, and those with lights themselves. Those where a T junction would suffice.<br />
e.g. Ones with raised centres that obscure the view of on-coming vehicles.<br />
e.g. Roundabouts built because, in the long run, they are cheaper than maintaining lights (or deities forbid, cheaper than flyovers).</p>
<p>Just some thoughts &#8211; flame me or agree or add. I&#8217;m easy. Just think about it. And think about it when your local authority is building yet another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival Mark</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>I reckon, they should change the name &quot;roundabouts&quot; to &quot;straight-through-abouts&quot; as most of the drivers on &#039;roundabouts&#039; don&#039;t follow the lane they&#039;re supposed to be in. I can&#039;t tell you the amount of times i&#039;ve had to jam on to avoid someone that&#039;s cut into the lane i&#039;m in while taking, say, the third exit &amp; they&#039;re taking the second exit...grrrr!!!

I feel like walking!! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon, they should change the name &#8220;roundabouts&#8221; to &#8220;straight-through-abouts&#8221; as most of the drivers on &#8217;roundabouts&#8217; don&#8217;t follow the lane they&#8217;re supposed to be in. I can&#8217;t tell you the amount of times i&#8217;ve had to jam on to avoid someone that&#8217;s cut into the lane i&#8217;m in while taking, say, the third exit &amp; they&#8217;re taking the second exit&#8230;grrrr!!!</p>
<p>I feel like walking!! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hayes</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>james hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Well i think every one should have to spend some time standing at the rounabout on the Ballymahon road out side Athlone. every morning you can see the speed of the newcomers as they think a roundabout is for who gets on to it first.
i have seen cars with our new friends having near misses and still it goes on. 
 Now dont think i have anything against our new friends, but you cant go from a bike to a car over night and think an L sign is a licence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i think every one should have to spend some time standing at the rounabout on the Ballymahon road out side Athlone. every morning you can see the speed of the newcomers as they think a roundabout is for who gets on to it first.<br />
i have seen cars with our new friends having near misses and still it goes on.<br />
 Now dont think i have anything against our new friends, but you cant go from a bike to a car over night and think an L sign is a licence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehat</title>
		<link>http://shitedrivers.com/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>thehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shitedrivers.com/index.php/2007/09/03/we-all-think-were-right-all-of-the-time/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>This is one of my pet hates.

1. Traffic on the roundabout always has right away, dont matter how long your sitting there.

2. The speed at which you approach a roundabout has no bearing on your right of way only your stupidity. If two cars approach a roundabout at different speeds from different directions if the slow moving car enters the roundabout first they are right even if the car is coming from the right and has to stand on there brakes. This is a common one. 

3. Most people do not know how to drive on , indicate, enter or leave roundabouts correctly but still proceed to blow their horn at you when you cross them even though they have gone all the way around the roundabout in the outside lane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my pet hates.</p>
<p>1. Traffic on the roundabout always has right away, dont matter how long your sitting there.</p>
<p>2. The speed at which you approach a roundabout has no bearing on your right of way only your stupidity. If two cars approach a roundabout at different speeds from different directions if the slow moving car enters the roundabout first they are right even if the car is coming from the right and has to stand on there brakes. This is a common one. </p>
<p>3. Most people do not know how to drive on , indicate, enter or leave roundabouts correctly but still proceed to blow their horn at you when you cross them even though they have gone all the way around the roundabout in the outside lane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

